Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1A. All WGs do a near-perfect job on their drafts, including complete
> management of cross-area reviews.
> 2A. All WG Chairs to do a near-perfect job.
...
> 2C. Summary closure of failing WGs.
>> 3. Fewer working groups to manage.
> 3A. IESG refuses the majority of proposed WGs.
..
>> 6. Less/no involvement with creating the schedule.
> [I'm not sure that will work. ADs are uniquely placed to identify
> clashes and overlaps.]
Well, if one applies the above suggestions, then the schedule becomes much
easier to deal with.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
Attachment:
pgpNLBNn2HZI5.pgp
Description: PGP signature