I am part of the community design team as well because I participate with community more than the private hidden groups. I think that the draft is a true work open to IETF. I still did not get a reply to my request to know what is the DT authority, very strange name without any procedure in IETF, please explain,
AB
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I'm part of the design team. SM has written this document to begin a discussion with the broader IETF.
The document does not have the consensus of the design team, and it is therefore obviously not a recommendation by the design team.
Lars
> S. Moonesamy<draft-ddt-fellowship-03.txt>
On Oct 10, 2013, at 20:10, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jari,
>
> Here's is a draft about improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF. The draft builds upon the ISOC work, proposing adjustments and additional efforts, with the goal of enabling more sustained and active participation by contributors from under-represented regions.
>
> In a blog article ( http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/04/diversity/ ), it is mentioned that:
>
> "The design team will present their recommendations to the community,
> and engage in the discussion. Recommendations with community support
> will be taken forward."
>
> The draft only makes suggestions instead of recommendations. I am copying this message to ietf@xxxxxxxx so that the community can comment about the draft.
>
> Regards,