Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06

Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx> · Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:03:40 -0400



    David,

    
        Steve,
         
        I
            think the modified introduction text suffices to connect the
            PATHSEC and BGPsec terms, but I don’t think that referring
            to the SIDR WG charter for the PATHSEC goals is reasonable –
            an RFC is an archive document, whereas a WG charter is not.
      
    
    The revised intro text now paraphrases the text from the SIDR
    charter that

    describes the path security goals.

    
    Steve