We have just submitted a new version (v05) that addresses all the comment we received so far.
Please, let us know if you have any further comments.
Regards,
Rifaat
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Mary,
I similarly apologize for the delay in responding. It's been a busy week.
As I started to go over your responses one by one, I realized I had notated each one as WFM. So rather than send all that, I will summarize as "I agree with all of your responses, and updates to these effects will resolve all of my concerns."
Thanks!
Ben.
[...]
On Sep 16, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I apologize for the delay in responding. I had initially missed this review - it either got cached directly with gen-art reviews or the tools alias burped. I'm not on the main IETF list with this email address.
>
> Anyways, thank you very much for your thorough review. Our responses are below [MB].
>
> We have an update underway that addresses your's and other's LC comments. We can forward that to you to preview if you would like.
>
> Regards,
> Mary.