IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [spfbis] Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Rolf E. Sonneveld
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Owen DeLong
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Nicholas Weaver
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Nicholas Weaver
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fatai Zhang
• Gen-Art LC review for draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: was: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• was: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: SM
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Nicholas Weaver
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Evan Hunt
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: David Morris
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: SM
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Owen DeLong
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Owen DeLong
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Mark ZZZ Smith
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Jim Gettys
• the evil of html was Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: t.p.
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: t.p.
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: t.p.
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: John Levine
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John Levine
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John Levine
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: SM
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: David Morris
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Dan York
• What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [IETF] Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Brim
• High-volume benchmark (was Re: [apps-discuss] cbor-05)
  • From: Pierre Thierry
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Erik Nordmark
• AUTO: Lindsay S Reiser is out of the office on maternity leave. (returning 09/30/2013)
  • From: Lindsay S Reiser
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Cyrus Daboo
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Anshuman Pratap Chaudhary
• Re: High-volume benchmark (was Re: [apps-discuss] cbor-05)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: John Levine
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Teachable moment
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• RE: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: pgp signing in van
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: SM
• Re: thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: l.wood
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: SM
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: SM
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Hector Santos
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-12
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tim Chown
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: SM
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: David Morris
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: SM
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• RE: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Teachable moment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tim Chown
• decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Adam Novak
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: SM
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ray Hunter
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Stefan Winter
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: REVISED Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-02.txt> (The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results) to Informational RFC
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Martin Sustrik
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Alan Johnston
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: pgp signing in van
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Adam Novak
• RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fatai Zhang
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: SM
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Randy Bush
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Martin Millnert
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: cb.list6
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• pgp signing in van
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dean Willis
• Unbearable related to misspellings ideas (was Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: REVISED Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-02.txt> (The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: REVISED Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-02.txt> (The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results) to Informational RFC
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: "Deprecate"
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: New Mailing List: Internet governance and IETF technical work
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: New Mailing List: Internet governance and IETF technical work
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: REVISED Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-02.txt> (The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: James Polk
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Gert Doering
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: david.binet
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Bradner, Scott
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: Vancouver meeting is coming up fast
  • From: Fabian Jr
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Eduardo A. Suárez
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Eduardo A. Suárez
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Bradner, Scott
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Vancouver meeting is coming up fast
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Creating an umbrella group for Network Sync Protocols
  • From: todd
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: making our meetings more worth the time/expense
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: William McCall
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Phill
• draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [IAB] Call for Volunteers to Serve on the ICANN Nominating Committee
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Call for Volunteers to Serve on the ICANN Nominating Committee
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Call for Volunteers to Serve on the ICANN Nominating Committee
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Is the datatracker authoritative (was: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc))
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Is the datatracker authoritative (was: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc))
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Is the datatracker authoritative (was: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc))
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Is the datatracker authoritative (was: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc))
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Mail lost yesterday
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Mail lost yesterday
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: Michelle Cotton
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dan Schlitt
• AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: Cyrus Daboo
• Re: Mail lost yesterday
  • From: SM
• Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Mail lost yesterday
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: Mail lost yesterday
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Mail lost yesterday
  • From: SM
• Mailman service interruption yesterday
  • From: Glen
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Mail lost yesterday
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Mail lost yesterday
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dave Crocker
• LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt
  • From: Eric Rosen
• Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: "Deprecate"
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: "Deprecate"
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: t.p.
• RE: "Deprecate"
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: "Deprecate"
  • From: Michelle Cotton
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation ofStandards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
  • From: t.p.
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Roni Even
• RE: "Deprecate"
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• RE: "Deprecate"
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• "Deprecate"
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Loa Andersson
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Roni Even
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Mach Chen
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Roni Even
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Mach Chen
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: charging remote participants
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: I-D Action: draft-sweet-uri-zoneid-00.txt
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: charging remote participants
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11
  • From: Jouni Korhonen
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: I-D Action: draft-sweet-uri-zoneid-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Rude responses
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Rude responses
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Overloaded TXT harmful (was" Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Fwd: Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Dave Aronson
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Fwd: Fred MacMurray's
  • From: Casey Farrell
• Re: [IAOC] GST/PST and IETF 88
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jelte Jansen
• Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jelte Jansen
• Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: [Recentattendees] Huawei is the Host for IETF 88 in Vancouver
  • From: Joachimpillai, Damascene M
• Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF
  • From: bmanning
• Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jelte Jansen
• Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John R Levine
• GST/PST and IETF 88
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jelte Jansen
• RE: Rude responses
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Hadriel Kaplan
• Re: Charging remote participants
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change]
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change]
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change]
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF
  • From: Scott Kitterman