IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Christian Huitema
• RE: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05.txt> (Recommendations on filtering of IPv4 packets containing IPv4 options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• IPR disclosure for draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id (was: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt)
  • From: SM
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: SM
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• RE: Education and Information Sharing ... was Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Moriarty, Kathleen
• Education and Information Sharing ... was Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: feedback & blog entry
  • From: todd
• Re: Dotless in draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: SM
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: todd
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Kevin Darcy
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: John C Klensin
• Dotless in draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Moriarty, Kathleen
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Martin Sustrik
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Vancouver meeting is coming up fast (reminder)
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• feedback & blog entry
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Josh Howlett
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-12
  • From: Jouni Korhonen
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Applied Networking Research Prize 2013 presentation at IETF-88
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-12
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt> (Threat Model for BGP Path Security) to Informational RFC
  • From: Russ White
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt> (Threat Model for BGP Path Security) to Informational RFC
  • From: Danny McPherson
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Alan Clark
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-03.txt> (Characterization of Proposed Standards) to Best Current Practice
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Macro Expansion
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Macro Expansion (was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: IETF 88 - Hotel Reservations: REMINDER
  • From: Brian Haberman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Juliao Braga
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Why we don't want to actually replace 2026
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D Action: draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-02.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: Fwd: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Pat Thaler
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid-10
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Fwd: FW: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-04
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Alan Clark
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Dave Cridland
• RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Jim Gettys
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Why we don't want to actually replace 2026 (was: PS Characterization Clarified)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Greg Daley
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-05
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Yoav Nir
• RE: [Int-area] Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01.txt> (Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Server Load Balancing) to Informational RFC
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: John Levine
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: John Levine
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: David Morris
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Juliao Braga
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Macro Expansion (was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• IETF Mentor Program
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: [Int-area] Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01.txt> (Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Server Load Balancing) to Informational RFC
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Glen Wiley
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: geoff . ietf
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Barry Leiba
• ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: GTW
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Ralph Droms
• RE: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt> (Requirements for an End-to-End Session Identification in IP-Based Multimedia Communication Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: Messages to SPFBIS mailing list (was: [spfbis] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19: (with COMMENT))
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Messages to SPFBIS mailing list (was: [spfbis] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19: (with COMMENT))
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tobias Gondrom
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tobias Gondrom
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt> (Requirements for an End-to-End Session Identification in IP-Based Multimedia Communication Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• RE: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Nicholas Weaver
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: robert bownes
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Dickson, Brian
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Dickson, Brian
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• RtgDir Review: draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-05.txt
  • From: Thomas Heide Clausen
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt> (Threat Model for BGP Path Security) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: David Morris
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: James Polk
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt> (Threat Model for BGP Path Security) to Informational RFC
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [spfbis] Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Rolf E. Sonneveld
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Owen DeLong
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Nicholas Weaver
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Nicholas Weaver
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fatai Zhang
• Gen-Art LC review for draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: was: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• was: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: SM
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Nicholas Weaver
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Evan Hunt
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: David Morris
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: SM
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Owen DeLong
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Owen DeLong
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Mark ZZZ Smith
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Jim Gettys
• the evil of html was Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: t.p.
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: t.p.
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: t.p.
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: John Levine
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John Levine
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: not really pgp signing in van
  • From: John Levine
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: SM
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: David Morris
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Dan York
• What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [IETF] Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Brim
• High-volume benchmark (was Re: [apps-discuss] cbor-05)
  • From: Pierre Thierry
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Erik Nordmark
• AUTO: Lindsay S Reiser is out of the office on maternity leave. (returning 09/30/2013)
  • From: Lindsay S Reiser
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Cyrus Daboo
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Anshuman Pratap Chaudhary
• Re: High-volume benchmark (was Re: [apps-discuss] cbor-05)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: John Levine
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Teachable moment
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• RE: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: pgp signing in van
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: SM
• Re: thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• thoughts on pervasive monitoring
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: l.wood
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: SM
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Equably when it comes to privacy
  • From: SM
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Hector Santos
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-12
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Conclusions of Last Call for draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tim Chown
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: SM
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: David Morris
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: SM
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• RE: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Teachable moment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tim Chown
• decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Adam Novak
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: SM
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ray Hunter
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Stefan Winter
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: REVISED Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-02.txt> (The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results) to Informational RFC
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: pgp signing in van
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Martin Sustrik
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Alan Johnston
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: pgp signing in van
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Adam Novak
• RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fatai Zhang
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: SM
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Randy Bush
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Martin Millnert
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Brian E Carpenter