-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/9/13 11:02 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote: > Hi Peter, > > --On September 8, 2013 at 5:19:51 PM -0600 Peter Saint-Andre > <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> But until the MUAs across the board support it out of the box, >>> I believe most people don't know about it or know what it >>> means. >> >> So that's an opportunity to educate people. For instance, perhaps >> the Internet Society might be interested in taking on that task. > > Is there a reason you choose to use "inline" signing with PGP > rather than multipart/signed? Is that a technical reason (e.g., > poor interoperability)? Ignorance or misconfiguration in my use of Thunderbird, it seems. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSLgF/AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pnG8P/RpJj1SDr1plL3myoumgi4iS 0RLDNqq+2J+aiuDOccVJZYRITWFo3HmP3XD+nuDXiVxVUl+vuDhWHhWzQxtV04DS AUTN5mgY7Z5z2wfECFzC2MmqEG9tVD7i/gTij8cHTHyFuMvF27X32nTe/gxpo0eu 5cOhbzt2YWyF0nZff8cbQ+7o6d8RtaqE6G+jJVS4qUWeqEhYoFjjIGWieHZaNmw2 U/CQfYnAbpph/D38QDP/Tw8UJkNLXlukrbKPKtd+8Z/KAxGYkldabD01Frdkt5ZF k2PosNHHpy9Ob61SH8N/vrAO/NF4c6VYEoAk8yqCgYLLNH3BSc3fSUoGjF47VU8f PMKW/Hz9cG/1P5VhVTHNPx50b5Auuglo36pLIvlJjYzT8cZCpaCElhn4dScKLMLt //E+/EdTs6gnayBgbok31NXPWr4ORMlaff8jSinVK08COIGyCyul+9vo2/vs4WdI XZ8ToqmXUg/0d0KfRozqCQwKDHHqdkYIfTt8/rLDheXUDTTuvKWxmmLLxXs6CXMU kMQ99IaRraoAVWaEiUhIdLH3Ewj7ibFsqx9UruvUX5irqDO9SbjlJC7b41iHgUIG HBJiH3w947+mHLIXFJ2G9dBcv+CuOYVATqScu0jSDbsWE6xsqS1miNofyr1+al49 wcogO/B8kXm7cSHJjce5 =cGPH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----