Re: pgp signing in van

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have removed the attribution of this comment on purpose, because it applies
to multiple people, and I want to attack a behaviour, not a person:

    >> This is what I mean by "a high bar."   Signing someone's PGP key should mean
    >> "I know this person as X," not "this person is X."

    > Dilution of trust is a problem with PGP. "I know this person as X" is way too
    > lax if you want the system to scale.

Frankly, this is an example of pseudo-security “uphill and in the snow both
ways” that has meant that, 20 years after S/MIME and PGP, almost nobody
uses this stuff, even for the most elementary of things.

Remember: "better is the enemy of good enough".

To all the people who posted to this thread about how they don't know what
a PGP key signature means, and who did not PGP or S/MIME their email:
    Stop getting in the way.
    This is how an NSA mole would derail things: claim it needs to be better

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works


Attachment: pgpAWBDJfaU32.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]