It has been pointed out to me that I went overboard in my response to you. I will state what was obvious to me as I wrote my response, but may not have been obvious to other readers: I am not the responsible AD for v6ops. My response was that of a participant in v6ops. I didn't find what you wrote helpful, but what I like isn't particularly important in this case, unless you decide it is. I did not intend to suggest that you should not criticize this document. I would like to see more substance to the criticism. But the way I expressed that desire was (a) overly sarcastic and (b) not constructive, and I apologize for that.