Owen, do you have any technical objection to raise about this document, or are you just replying because you like the sound the keys make as you type?
The working group adopted the document, so it's too late to object that the working group shouldn't be working on it. You can object by pointing out that it doesn't do what it says it's going to do, but if so you'd need to actually make the case that it doesn't do that, not just assert that it doesn't do that.
Your point about RFC 2119 language has been addressed, so there's no sense in re-raising it unless you have some specific objection to state about the way in which it was addressed ("I'm not satisfied" is not a specific objection).
Etc.