Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Vinayak,
At 01:13 06-09-2013, Vinayak Hegde wrote:
It is tragic if the community does understand strong encryption is essential in many cases (with the caveat that it is not a panacea for all security breaches) As for raising issues at the last-call. Why not ? The last-call is no different than any other mailing list discussion or going to the mic in a physical meeting. (Other than the urgency of having the last chance to comment ?)

The Last Call is different from going to the microphone in a physical meeting. Fancy speeches at the microphone are impressive. It takes more work to identify issues and explain why it is or can be a problem. Martin Sustrik asked:

At 06:04 06-09-2013, Martin Sustrik wrote:
So, what if an NSA guys comes in and proposes backdoor to be added to a protocol? Is it even a valid interest? Does IETF as an organisation have anything to say about that or does it remain strictly neutral?

Would anyone notice it on a Last Call? Would anyone say something about it? I doubt that. Ted Lemon said it nicely: "we should pay attention".

Regards,
-sm




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]