Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Having consent form all vendors is valuable but I'm afraid this is not the goal of this document.

If not "all vendors", then what about "some vendors"? Is it a goal of this document to have consensus from some implementors? Or is consensus from implementors a non-goal?

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]