On 9/17/13 5:52 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Pete Resnick<presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would like to change "IESG" to "IETF" in five places:
Section 1:
"the IESG has evolved its review processes"
Section 2:
"IESG Reveiew of Proposed Standards"
"the IESG strengthened its review"
"last chance for the IESG to ensure the quality"
"cross-area technical review performed by the IESG"
The IETF as a whole, through directorate reviews, area reviews, doctor reviews, *and* IESG reviews, has evolved, strengthened, ensured, etc., its reviews.
I believe that change would be factually incorrect
Which part of the above do you think is factually incorrect?
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478