Fedora Desktop
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- Re: Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- 2014-08-20 @ 16:00 UTC ** F21 Blocker Bug Review
- Re: Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- Re: Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- Re: Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Guidelines draft: Apps and launchers
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Problems with Adwaita theme
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Another workstation question: Anaconda user creation
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Another workstation question: Anaconda user creation
- Re: Another workstation question: Anaconda user creation
- Re: Another workstation question: Anaconda user creation
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Another workstation question: Anaconda user creation
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Another workstation question: Anaconda user creation
- Another workstation question: Anaconda user creation
- Fedora workstation: what do we want installed by default?
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Fedora 21 Workstation nightly compose is still failing
- Re: Fedora 21 Workstation nightly compose is still failing
- Fedora 21 Workstation nightly compose is still failing
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- From: Rui Tiago Cação Matos
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: ABRT?
- Developer focus for Fedora workstation
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: When will nmtui be released on Fedora 20?
- Re: When will nmtui be released on Fedora 20?
- Re: When will nmtui be released on Fedora 20?
- When will nmtui be released on Fedora 20?
- Re: updated gartner report on PC shipments
- Re: updated gartner report on PC shipments
- Re: updated gartner report on PC shipments
- Re: updated gartner report on PC shipments
- Re: updated gartner report on PC shipments
- updated gartner report on PC shipments
- Re: fedora.next joint session at flock
- Re: fedora.next joint session at flock
- Re: fedora.next joint session at flock
- fedora.next joint session at flock
- Re: Enable "Solarized" color schemes by default for Workstation
- Re: BtrFS in Workstation features
- BtrFS in Workstation features
- Re: Enable "Solarized" color schemes by default for Workstation
- Re: Enable "Solarized" color schemes by default for Workstation
- Re: Enable "Solarized" color schemes by default for Workstation
- From: Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
- Re: Enable "Solarized" color schemes by default for Workstation
- Re: NetworkManager captive portal detection by default in Workstation
- Re: NetworkManager captive portal detection by default in Workstation
- Re: Enable "Solarized" color schemes by default for Workstation
- From: Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
- Re: Enable "Solarized" color schemes by default for Workstation
- Enable "Solarized" color schemes by default for Workstation
- Re: NetworkManager captive portal detection by default in Workstation
- Re: NetworkManager captive portal detection by default in Workstation
- Re: NetworkManager captive portal detection by default in Workstation
- Re: NetworkManager captive portal detection by default in Workstation
- Re: NetworkManager captive portal detection by default in Workstation
- NetworkManager captive portal detection by default in Workstation
- Re: New Fedora 22 Change Proposal: Fedora Atomic
- Re: New Fedora 22 Change Proposal: Fedora Atomic
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: Introduction, Documenting Workstation
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- Re: ABRT?
- ABRT?
- Re: Fedora 21 Alpha validation test work
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: Removing Bloat from the next Live CD (Desktop)
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: Removing Bloat from the next Live CD (Desktop)
- Re: Removing Bloat from the next Live CD (Desktop)
- Removing Bloat from the next Live CD (Desktop)
- Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
- Re: Fedora 21 Alpha validation test work
- Re: 2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1
- Re: Introduction, Documenting Workstation
- Fedora 21 Alpha validation test work
- Getting the (approximate) Bootloader Spec into Fedora
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Draft combined Alpha release criteria for F21
- Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
- Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
- Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
- Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
- Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
- Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
- Re: Workstation release criteria draft, pt. 2 (with bonus test cases and matrix!)
- Workstation release criteria draft, pt. 2 (with bonus test cases and matrix!)
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Default application handling external USB devices changed to "Disk analyser"?
- Re: Default application handling external USB devices changed to "Disk analyser"?
- Default application handling external USB devices changed to "Disk analyser"?
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Should gtkhtml be on the copr repository?
- Re: Should gtkhtml be on the copr repository?
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Should gtkhtml be on the copr repository?
- Re: Should gtkhtml be on the copr repository?
- Should gtkhtml be on the copr repository?
- Re: Broken libchamplain makes maps unusable
- Broken libchamplain makes maps unusable
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Curating the metadata in the Software application
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Re: Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Gnome 3.14 copr on F20
- Multibooting UX, how well it ought to work
- Initial very rough Workstation release criteria draft
- Re: Tasklist for the Fedora Workstation
- Tasklist for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: Slipping F21 (was: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-11))
- Re: Slipping F21
- Re: Slipping F21
- Re: Slipping F21
- Re: Slipping F21 (was: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-11))
- Slipping F21 (was: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-11))
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- From: Diogo Campos (cadastros)
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- From: Diogo Campos (cadastros)
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- From: Diogo Campos (cadastros)
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- Re: A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- A bit more about default apps for Workstation
- From: Diogo Campos (cadastros)
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- From: Diogo Campos (cadastros)
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- DNF and Copr plugin in Rawhide
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- From: Diogo Campos (cadastros)
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- From: Diogo Campos (cadastros)
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Should Firefox stay the default browser in Fedora Workstation?
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- tracking needs [was Re: Package List Discussion]
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: Permissions required to install/uninstall software
- Re: Permissions required to install/uninstall software
- Re: Permissions required to install/uninstall software
- Permissions required to install/uninstall software
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Re: Package List Discussion
- Package List Discussion
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- List of Qt/Qt5 packages for Fedora WS
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues
- Re: Draft Fedora 21 Test Plan
- Re: Draft Fedora 21 Test Plan
- Re: Draft Fedora 21 Test Plan
- Draft Fedora 21 Test Plan
- Re: Fedora.next Product Branding
- Re: Fedora.next Product Branding
- Re: Fedora.next Product Branding
- Re: Fedora.next Product Branding
- Re: Fedora.next Product Branding
- Re: Fedora.next Product Branding
- Re: Fedora.next Product Branding
- Re: Fedora.next Product Branding
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Re: Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Your input is needed: Fedora workstation comps group
- Mommy, why do I have duplicate packages installed?
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Cure for shrinking terminals found
- Re: Cure for shrinking terminals found
- Cure for shrinking terminals found
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- From: Max Rydahl Andersen
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- How to try fedora workstation ?
- From: Max Rydahl Andersen
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Wayland in rawhide should work again
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: Initial WS live image kickstart files
- Re: Initial WS live image kickstart files
- Re: Initial WS live image kickstart files
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Fedora.next: Scope of the Workstation product
- Fedora.next: Scope of the Workstation product
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- clarification on "Workstation: Enable Software Collections" change proposal
- Re: Current package list for the Workstation product
- Re: Current package list for the Workstation product
- Initial WS live image kickstart files
- Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Current package list for the Workstation product
- Re: Current package list for the Workstation product
- Current package list for the Workstation product
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Deliverables and release engineering changes for Fedora.Next
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: External websites and Fedora's Foundations
- Re: External websites and Fedora's Foundations
- Re: External websites and Fedora's Foundations
- External websites and Fedora's Foundations
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 change for the Workstation: software collections
- F21 change for the Workstation: software collections
- F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Reminder: Change Proposals Submission Deadline in one week!
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Introduction, Documenting Workstation
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Trying Wayland
- Reminder: Change Proposals Submission Deadline in two weeks
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Flock registration and talk proposals open
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora KDE]
[Kernel Announce]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]