-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/27/2014 11:30 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 18:51 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> This is largely directed to the WG, as a request to clarify a >> part of the workstation product tech spec. It relates to a thread >> on the anaconda list regarding os-prober, and a thread on this >> list regarding release criteria, both of which are referenced >> below. >> >> I am cross posting to the server@ list as well, while they don't >> have a dual-boot requirement in their spec it stands to reason >> the ability to dual-boot Fedora Server/CentOS/RHEL version n and >> n+1 could come in handy when doing migrations while still having >> a fall back position. Perhaps replies should drop the other cross >> posting since the requirements for the two products are >> different? But I leave up to the person replying to decide. > > To be honest I do not see any need whatsoever for multibooting in > the Server case. > > So whatever abilities the Workstation WG want will be sufficient > IMO. I will second this. Dual-booting is not particularly valuable in our case. People doing migrations are generally doing staged upgrades in a testing environment first. Now, there's certainly an argument to be made for a robust rollback mechanism, but that's a different topic (and one we will probably explore with Project Atomic in Fedora 22). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOtkWkACgkQeiVVYja6o6MX7ACfU4ulkBM5dRueulEKKsUA2SRs cOcAnjzpu5ctpX4RfXxoQjwb+sXgNSHJ =2QSK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
