-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/06/2014 01:18 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 12:33 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> It might run afoul of the Firefox trademark thing. A rebranded >> "IceWeasle GNOME" loses all the brand recognition. > > I know we are not allowed to apply unauthorized patches. I didn't > realize extensions might also be impermissible. If so, that would > be a strong argument against Firefox. We should invoke the lawyers here, but I doubt that this would be impermissible. I suspect that Firefox implicitly allows this simply by offering a public extension interface and a freely-available mechanism to apply them. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOR+dkACgkQeiVVYja6o6MgywCfUEs4L4KMq6lfML657fSfOWRk 3WkAn2rVqkUFBXuWOLUwSdwk9DsIN3VR =kFsT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
