On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/06/2014 12:20 PM, Elad Alfassa wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Christian Schaller >> <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> Hi Elad, Some of the issues you mention we actually have people in >> the desktop team at Red Hat working on, like the GTK3 port. >> >> In general I am tempted to keep Firefox as our primary browser for >> a variety of reasons like brand recognition, security updates and >> web site support. So while I am positive to the effort the Web team >> are undertaking I am having a hard time convincing myself they >> would be a better choice for us despite the integration advantage >> they bring. >> >> Christian >> >> >> I'm well aware of the efforts going on to port firefox to GTK3. >> Nevertheless, this port won't get us much, because Firefox will >> still look alien to the rest of the desktop (which is something >> upstream is unwilling to change, and Fedora people objected to >> including the "Firefox GNOME" theme by default). >> > > Is there any reason that this cannot be packaged separately from the > 'firefox' SRPM and included as part of Fedora Workstation? I don't > think it's an unreasonable thing for the Workstation WG to decide > should be default on that Product. It might run afoul of the Firefox trademark thing. A rebranded "IceWeasle GNOME" loses all the brand recognition. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
