On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 19:30 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > I think without making the details page in gnome-software resize and > reflow (which we don't really want to do) we really have to ask for > 16:9 screenshots. I'm sure we can work on the padding+resizing > algorithm, as that does some pretty brain-dead things (like resizing a > 760x431 image to 752x423) sometimes. :/ I'm really at a loss for what to do here. For some games, I've placed windows side-by-side, and have a screenshot of them both together. For others I zoomed in and cropped. Either way looks pretty bad. > This is what we've been working on > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Application.html > -- it's for version 0.7 of the spec, but applies equally well on older > versions. > > You mean <name> then, not <project_name>. What I would do in this case > is have "Chess" as the name in the .desktop file, and "GNOME Chess" in > the AppData file. OK, so it seems like it'd be good to go through GNOME and start adding the <project_name> tag to all the appdata files, so the software center shows GNOME Files, GNOME Documents, etc. instead of the generic names. And <project_group> as well. I can do this for the core apps if this is what you want to happen? > Right, the metadata extractor uses a few different heuristics[1] to > try and set the <project_group> if not already set as this is very > important so that we prioritize GNOME apps on GNOME, and KDE apps in > KDE. We've actually added a <project_name> tag if you want to show > something translatable in the software center, e.g. "The GNOME Chess > Developers" rather than falling back to the untranslated > <project_group>. Just GNOME is fine for me; no need to translate that!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
