On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 10:39 -0700, Kalvin Lee wrote: > I add an apology: I think my not using GNOME might be glossed over, > but > I was very remiss not to investigate upstream Epiphany builds. Sorry. > I > live under a rock. Not really. Very few users would download and build a newer version than is provided by their distro, and that Epiphany has been improving so much recently is unusual. (This brings up another issue with Epiphany: the release cycle should be adjusted to cater to distros that cannot upgrade its dependencies in a stable release. Or maybe it'd be mostly sufficient if Fedora was willing to do major WebKit updates?)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
