Speaking entirely from a layman's perspective, I disagree
with this proposal. I have GNOME Web on my machine as a secondary
browser; while I do like its UI and its GTK support, these are only
marginal considerations before the rest of the functionality in
Firefox. In the spirit of "Don't fix what's not broken" and "tyranny of the masses," I think that, constraining our view to Fedora users only, Firefox has a bigger userbase than Epiphany. Speaking purely for the layman end-user, it would appear a strange decision to abruptly abandon Firefox for GNOME Web. Yes, I am aware just how easy it us to run "su -c 'yum install firefox'," but not all unfortunate end-users are able, and I suspect the move would generate a great deal of bad publicity and FUD on the eye-rolling review sites. Yammering aside, I see Christian Schaller has actually summed up my points better than all my blabbering here. I do, however, agree with you (Elad) and Michael Catanzaro in that shipping two browsers won't work very well. Michael's usability questions also apply. For some reason I'm obligated to kill Epiphany every time after I close it (the process lingers?) and the compatibility issues are a little irksome (Google Images, for example, refuses completely to give my its modern continuously-scrolling interface). I would appreciate more exposure for GNOME Web, but shipping it by default might not attract the right audience for that. And I don't quite understand how Fedora contributing to Firefox "instead of" GNOME Web is the wrong direction, if anyone could expand on that for me? On 06/06/2014 08:52 AM, Elad Alfassa
wrote:
|
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop