On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 13:20 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 20:25 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > I'll test them out tomorrow
> > and post :)
>
> I get this today:
>
> $ dnf --refresh --best update -y
> ....
> Error: package NetworkManager-l2tp-0.9.8.6-1.fc20.x86_64 requires ppp =
> 2.4.5, but none of the providers can be installed. package
> evolution-data-server-3.12.3-1.fc20.x86_64 requires
> libgdata.so.13()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed.
> package NetworkManager-l2tp-0.9.8.6-1.fc20.x86_64 requires ppp = 2.4.5,
> but none of the providers can be installed
My output:
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
...
Installing
....
Upgrading
....
Reinstalling:
evolution-data-server x86_64
3.12.3-1.fc20
rhughes-f20-gnome-3-14-x86_64 2.9 M
I already thought this was wrong, but elected to let it check the
transaction:
Error: Transaction check error:
package evolution-data-server-3.12.3-1.fc20.x86_64 is already
installed
I thought dnf was just broken here, obviously if it knows it's a
re-install earlier, it's already installed. That shouldn't be a
show-stopper.
However , yum provides a slightly more useful, which actually explained
why dnf was trying to re-install evolution-data-server. It also covers
the above case.
I think dnf needs a bit of work to provide a tractable error message and
correctly explain why it is trying to re-install a package on upgrade:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: evolution-data-server-3.12.3-1.fc20.x86_64
(@rhughes-f20-gnome-3-12-x86_64)
Requires: libgdata.so.13()(64bit)
Removing: libgdata-0.14.1-1.fc20.x86_64 (@updates)
libgdata.so.13()(64bit)
Updated By: libgdata-0.15.1-2.fc20.x86_64
(rhughes-f20-gnome-3-14-x86_64)
~libgdata.so.19()(64bit)
Available: libgdata-0.14.0-1.fc20.x86_64 (fedora)
libgdata.so.13()(64bit)
To me this looks like e-d-s needs re-releasing to depend on the newer
libgdata
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
