On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Elad Alfassa <elad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 22:13 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: >> > I think apps should ship with both 64x64 and 128x128, and Software >> > should use the 64x64 ones still. >> >> From our draft HIG [1]: "It is essential your application has a >> 256x256px size. With the advent of high-DPI displays, a 512x512px >> variant is recommended." So it probably makes sense to require 256x256 >> for applications installed by default. (The software center can be way >> more lenient.) >> >> [1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/HIG/IconsAndArtwork >> >> -- >> desktop mailing list >> desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop > > > That's getting bigger and bigger as we speak! > > I'm okay with requiring 128x128 for default applications, but 256x256 might > be asking too much... > I'm not sure what to do. I guess have 256x256 as MUST and 512x512 as SHOULD? > > Do you have statistics on apps shipping 256x256 icons in Fedora right now? > How many are there? How many non-gnome apps do that? That's overkill imo. The biggest icons we show in the UI are 96x96 (192x192 on hidpi) so 128x128 must with 256x256 as should is good enough. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
