On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 22:13 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:From our draft HIG [1]: "It is essential your application has a
> I think apps should ship with both 64x64 and 128x128, and Software
> should use the 64x64 ones still.
256x256px size. With the advent of high-DPI displays, a 512x512px
variant is recommended." So it probably makes sense to require 256x256
for applications installed by default. (The software center can be way
more lenient.)
[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/HIG/IconsAndArtwork
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
That's getting bigger and bigger as we speak!
I'm okay with requiring 128x128 for default applications, but 256x256 might be asking too much...
I'm not sure what to do. I guess have 256x256 as MUST and 512x512 as SHOULD?
Do you have statistics on apps shipping 256x256 icons in Fedora right now? How many are there? How many non-gnome apps do that?
--
-Elad Alfassa.
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
