----- Original Message ----- > Well I don't think it is worthwhile chasing the abrt bugs through bugzilla, > regardless of which bugzilla it uses. The true value of abrt is the data > that is collected and can be viewed through: > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/summary/ > > Because by looking at the 'problems' tab you will quite quickly see which > crashers are hitting > a lot of your users and are the ones making the distro seem unstable. > > Despite its shortcomings it is worthwhile to note that abrt catches between > 5000 and 10 000 crashers > a day, even going up to almost 24 000 one day for f20. So I think it does > provide enough data to help us > improve our quality. I know a lot of developers (and managers) are checking > the retrace data regularly and use it > to prioritize which bugs are looked at first. It's not as useful as you make it seem. There are things that can be fixed, certainly but there are also a number of those crashers for which there won't be an obvious answer, the result of a bug earlier in the code, and no way to reproduce the problem, contact the bug submitter, or get more information. > So instead of looking into dropping it we should if needed instead try to see > if we can try to > help the ABRT team improve it further. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
