On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 00:23 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 07/13/2014 09:08 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > I notice gdb is on the package list, but gcc is not. This combination > > doesn't seem very useful; what's bringing in gdb? > > Abrt I presume. > > -- > Kalev OK, good point. Next question: does ABRT work for you? Everything I've reported in the past month or so ended in an Emergency Analysis (the whole ABRT processing directory gets uploaded to the server, since there was an ABRT bug). Before that, I timed how long it took to report crashes: I believe I clocked a gnote crash at just under 15 minutes, a WebKit crash at about 40. (I'm positive I reported a bug about this, but I can't find it anymore.) This is so far beyond what I personally think is OK that I'd rather Workstation to have no ABRT at all, but I don't know if my experiences are typical. If others are experiencing the same, we should probably discuss where to draw the line and then get in touch with the ABRT devs. (It's not that I don't want a crash catcher, just that its benefits need to be balanced against the user experience. I think ABRT makes Fedora look bad.)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
