On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:38 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote: > Well as annoying abrt can be I think nothing ruins the user experience > more than > crashers, so if abrt helps us fix more crashers/the most important > crashers, I > think that improvement in user experience probably outweighs the > irritation > of abrt. > > Christian I think it is a thing we really want to have, since it helps find crashes and that's very important, but it's just not ready for general users. Even if you're OK with the extremely long waits, they usually end in an emergency report, and before the emergency reports started they would usually end with a notice that the crash cannot be reported. I'm actually confused how users are managing to report any bugs at all -- it just *doesn't work* at least for me. I'm not objecting to the theory behind ABRT, just the current implementation. If it gets dropped, I would happily welcome it back once these issues are resolved. P.S. If memory serves, and it might not, I think ABRT may have been faster and much more reliable in the past. I don't remember being annoyed with it when I started using Fedora (F18 era).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
