On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:41 -0700, Kalvin Lee wrote: > There isn't much to say about that except for > usability: if Mozilla wants to play the usability game, it can't always > turn its nose up at codecs, Flash (which hopefully the web is moving > away from), or DRM. And I suspect not supporting all these (save for > Flash, or dirty Gstreamer plugins? not entirely sure) plays a part in > Epiphany's continued role as an underdog relative to Firefox. Nah, Epiphany can use Flash and all gstreamer plugins you have installed. If your distro installs them for you, great! Fedora can't.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
