On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:02 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:47 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> *This is sent with my Fedora Design Team hat on* >>>>> >>>>> With the creation of 3 products for Fedora, the Fedora Design Team >>>>> anticipates manynewquestions aroundFedora'sbrand. As the main caretakers of >>>>> the Fedora brand, weare going to have to figure these things out within the >>>>> next few months. For example, the Design Team is starting to think about how >>>>> to answer these types of questions: >>>>> >>>>> * Should each product have its own logo? or >>>> >>>> No. >>> >>> Why don't you think so? (One word answers don't continue conversation.) >> >> Because it could cause confusion among users and vendors, weaken the >> fedora brand as such >> and does not seem to solve any real issue anyway. >> Its better to ask the one that proposes a change to justify it >> instead of the one that says that it should not be changed. > > Maybe we are thinking of different ends of what "separate logo" means. > I was thinking more along the lines of: > > http://blog.linuxgrrl.com/2014/05/22/fedora-next-brand-concept-1/ > > which isn't a _replacement_ for the Fedora logo, but seems complimentary to it. Oh indeed that wasn't clear from the initial mail. In that case having logos might make sense (i.e as long as the fedora logo and branding stays present). -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
