On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:02 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:47 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> *This is sent with my Fedora Design Team hat on* >>>> >>>> With the creation of 3 products for Fedora, the Fedora Design Team >>>> anticipates manynewquestions aroundFedora'sbrand. As the main caretakers of >>>> the Fedora brand, weare going to have to figure these things out within the >>>> next few months. For example, the Design Team is starting to think about how >>>> to answer these types of questions: >>>> >>>> * Should each product have its own logo? or >>> >>> No. >> >> Why don't you think so? (One word answers don't continue conversation.) > > Because it could cause confusion among users and vendors, weaken the > fedora brand as such > and does not seem to solve any real issue anyway. > Its better to ask the one that proposes a change to justify it > instead of the one that says that it should not be changed. Maybe we are thinking of different ends of what "separate logo" means. I was thinking more along the lines of: http://blog.linuxgrrl.com/2014/05/22/fedora-next-brand-concept-1/ which isn't a _replacement_ for the Fedora logo, but seems complimentary to it. >>>> * Can you add our product to the Fedora website? or >>> >>> Sure whats the point of having a fedora product that is not on the >>> fedora website .. >> >> I think the answer is more nuanced than that, and largely depends on >> what Products are actually approved. For now, I agree that having the >> existing 3 Products on the website makes sense. >> >>>> * Can you make our product its own website? >>> >>> No, shouldn't be needed product do not really overlap. >> >> I disagree here. I think having a unique website (or landing page) >> might very well be worthwhile. Dismissing this seems premature. > > What content would the workstation specific website have that is worth > the effort > of having a separate website? A page that explains what workstation is > after selecting or clicking on > the workstation might make sense tough. "Website" in the full definition of a separately hosted entity entirely is a lot of overhead, yeah. However, a unique URL might be useful as a landing page for people looking for a specific product. Again, I think there's a broad range of options here and dismissing it without exploring them seems premature. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
