Re: Workstation status and TODOs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]






----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kalev Lember" <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Christian Schaller" <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop" <desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Matthias Clasen"
> <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Christoph Wickert" <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Lukáš Tinkl" <ltinkl@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Owen
> Taylor" <otaylor@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Jens Petersen" <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ryan Lerch" <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:27:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Workstation status and TODOs
> 
> On 04/29/2014 03:08 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
> >> 5) Installation and compose methods work with rel-eng  (live image
> >> default, but install tree necessary for compose.  PXE/netboot iso?
> >> etc)
> > Anyone who can take this on? Maybe Kalev?
> 
> Sure, happy to take this on.
> 
> 
> >> I'm sure I'm missing a few things here.  Please chime in with what I'm
> >> forgetting.  In short, there's more than enough work to go around.
> >>
> >> Lastly, we've been rather quiet as a WG as of late.  The Cloud WG is
> >> going through a confirmation process with their members to make sure
> >> people are still interested and willing to do work.  That's not a bad
> >> idea for ourselves.  WG members, please take the time to reply with
> >> whether or not you wish to remain a WG member.
> > I do, and I do think that we need to find a better way to function as a
> > working group. I take part of the blame here for not pushing more on
> > this myself. Maybe we should try to structure our work like FeSCO? Since
> > the plan is for the working groups to replace many of the functions of
> > FeSCO then this would maybe be a good model?
> 
> I am interested in continuing as well.
> 
> Regarding the perceived quietness, I can think of two things:
> 
> One is that the #fedora-workstation irc channel isn't working very well
> since everybody is using the #fedora-desktop channel instead for
> everyday communication. Might make sense to officially ditch
> #fedora-workstation?
> 
> Another thing that makes it seem quiet is that we don't have regular
> weekly meetings. Other teams are doing those and it seems to be a good
> way to show the world what is going on in the WG -- with meeting status
> reports and all that stuff.

If I remember correctly the reason the workstation channel was established was to have
the channel on the same IRC server as the rest of the working group channels,
since the fedora-desktop channel is on Gimpnet. 

Christian
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux