-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/06/2014 02:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Seriously, it's like they're going out of their way to discourage > us from using their product. I need to apologize for this. It was said in frustration (and not really even in frustration of this situation). I was having a frustrating day and this seemed at the time to be just one more hurdle. Please forgive my hasty words. I should also note that someone from Mozilla reached out to me overnight and stated that they would be certainly willing to work with us to approve Workstation-specific Firefox defaults: " Mozilla is watching the discussion on Fedora Desktop ML and I just wanted to point out that getting approval to package in plugins and extensions is not impossible or hard to do. Mozilla has these restrictions to protect the end user not to make it hard on partners from shipping stuff to their users. For instance Ubuntu ships a number of extensions baked into their package. You can see our discussion about the issues raised on Desktop ML here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.planning/PjkCRmkkFmQ We would obviously love for Firefox to continue to be the default offered to Fedora Users and we know there are a lot of Mozillians that are contributors to both projects and enjoy that default. " I certainly would call this an act of good faith from Mozilla and believe that we should join this discussion thread so we can work with them to come to a mutually-beneficial outcome. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOS60gACgkQeiVVYja6o6MNXACgoQTAruN/M6GMXo5/nh2nKjc8 h/kAn0yAnO+RqobpBifyCG3yUMlzQ86W =SIKy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
