Fedora Desktop
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Reminder: Change Proposals Submission Deadline in one week!
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Introduction, Documenting Workstation
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Trying Wayland
- Reminder: Change Proposals Submission Deadline in two weeks
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Flock registration and talk proposals open
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: qt runtime support
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: qt runtime support
- Re: qt runtime support
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: Polishing the installer
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: Polishing the installer
- Polishing the installer
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- arm support of workstation product
- how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 packages: abrt says "package evince isn't signed with proper key"
- Gnome 3.12 packages: abrt says "package evince isn't signed with proper key"
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Workstation User Experience
- F21 change proposal
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: vetting the package list
- Re: vetting the package list
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- hw requirements
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: default filesystem
- default filesystem
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- From: Rui Tiago Cação Matos
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Fedora Board Working Group PRD approval
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- vetting the package list
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Other breakages with 3.12 update: Lifeograph
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Testing wayland with packages from the 3.12 COPR repo
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Testing wayland with packages from the 3.12 COPR repo
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Technical spec for the workstation, second draft
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Gnome Classic [Was: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product]
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Gnome Classic [Was: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product]
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: So are we skipping a gnome release?
- Re: So are we skipping a gnome release?
- Re: So are we skipping a gnome release?
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: Comment about DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: Wayland in F21: Default for workstation?
- Re: Wayland in F21: Default for workstation?
- Re: Wayland in F21: Default for workstation?
- Wayland in F21: Default for workstation?
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: DE discussion summary
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: DE discussion summary
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product, Meta-Desktop
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product, Meta-Desktop
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product, Meta-Desktop
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product, Meta-Desktop
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product, Meta-Desktop
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product, Meta-Desktop
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Fedora Workstation product
- Comment about DE discussion summary
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, GNOME 3 and the iPhone
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, GNOME 3 and the iPhone
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, GNOME 3 and the iPhone
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, GNOME 3 and the iPhone
- DE discussion summary
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product
- Criteria for underlying DE (Was: Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product)
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora KDE]
[Kernel Announce]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]