On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 08:34:26PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > btrfs is still where we really want to go, I kind of think we should avoid >> > the churn of swapping in one similar thing for another. (Since RHEL7 has >> > already forked, that ship has sailed.) We talked about having btrfs/xfs >> > filesystem talks at Flock -- is waiting until then too late to decide? >> Are we really going to repeat the whole conversation we already had >> around this earlier in the week? > [...] >> So. I'd like to crap or get off the pot now. This is supposedly due >> Monday, but every time someone insists I revisit it, it's going to >> take that much longer. Do you have something new we've missed? > > I did read all of that, and sorry if I'm being obtuse. I think it really > makes a difference if we still intend for btrfs to be the default in the > medium term (not just in hopeful thinking). If that is the case for > workstation but server still wants XFS even then, there doesn't seem to be > any point in bothering with consistency now since it won't be consistent in > a little bit anyway. On the other hand, if server does want to go with btrfs > and relatively soon, and again if consistency is important, I'd like to push > back on *server's* decision. Thanks for the clarification. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
