Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




On Feb 18, 2014 2:24 PM, "Matthias Clasen" <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've spent quite a bit of time last week on this document:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Technical_Specification
>
> It is not 100% complete, but I haven't found the time to get back to it
> since Friday, so I should probably open it up for a first round of
> review to the other WG member.
>
> Let me know what you think,
>
> Matthias
>
> --

I realize it's early days and process must come before product, but I was hoping to find something here that would differentiate between the Workstation Product and the current/default GNOME desktop offering.

In my imagination, the user was asked what sort of development they do, and appropriate packages were installed and settings applied. For example, vim/emacs with helpful plugins configured, IDEs deployed, compilers and libraries installed, some tooling like devassist or even container integration for testing.   Is this more roadmap territory?

--Pete

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux