Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Should the facts as they're presently known be included in the spec in the meantime, with a TDB status?

It's often helpful to get the acronym correct: TBD=To Be Determined. The main point of the thread was just to make sure this PRD item isn't totally missing in action on the technical spec, even if implementation details and timing are uncertain.

My subsequent responses on this thread will likely go down the rabbit hole…


Chris Murphy

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux