Rex Dieter wrote: > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > >> I heard, there were objections to have kdelibs in the tech specs. >> With move to KDE Frameworks 5, it could be raised again, as it's going >> to be more Qt 5 add on modules than old fashioned monolithic kdelibs. > > (Sorry for chiming in late), but that was a topic I was about to broach... > (if there was a prior discussion, mind pointing me to the thread?) > > I was going to propose considering adding kde-runtime in WG tech-specs. > This will essentially ensure that, well, core runtime bits are already > part of the expected install set. > > If there are objections, I'd like to hear them, in case it's something > that can be resolved through compromise and packaging modifications. > > I would assume one big issue is size, which is understandable. Efforts > can definitely be made to split out non-essential functionality to reduce > dependencies and size impact. That will only go so far of course, > underlying stuff like qt/oxygen-icons can't be cut. ping, I'm interested in helping work on this, but need help/feedback. -- Rex -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
