Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Feb 21, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 23:32 +0200, Elad Alfassa wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>> 
>>> Trying with a new thread: One of the edits I did yesterday was to add a
>>> section for 'Installation methods and media'. So far, it is empty.
>>> 
>>> Are there any ideas for doing something other than live USB sticks
>>> here ?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> desktop mailing list
>>> desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I still think we should produce optical media (and have optical media as an
>> option), if only because that's cheaper to give away in conferences :)
> 
> In practice, a live image below 4.7GB in size (and I don't think we're
> likely to exceed that) is always going to be DVD-writeable, I believe.

Well sorta. It's writable, but to also be  bootable it's got a lot of baggage:
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11285.html

Dropping ISO 9660 support in the deliverable images probably simplifies things at least somewhat. Maybe more than somewhat. If all we need is a hybrid MBR, to boot BIOS and UEFI with the same image, then it sounds to me like successful media creation becomes easier. The OS X Disk Utility probably would successfully write such an image to a USB stick. Right now it fails because it hemorrhages when trying to parse the multiple partition maps it finds in the current ISOs.



Chris Murphy

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux