On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 10:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:41:37 +1100 > Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 08:49 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > Agreed, perhaps a mail to the copr mailing list would be in order. > > > > I dropped a mail to the COPR mailing list. For the time being, setting > > up separate repos for x86_64 and i386 should work: > > > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/79449/93059786/ > > Enabling both on a x86_64 machine? > > I don't think thats a good idea... mulitlib doesn't include _all_ 32bit > packages in the 64bit repo, only some, so you could well get conflicts > doing that. Well, the 'obvious' thing would be for COPRs to follow the same multilib policy: if something's multilib in the base distro and you build it in a COPR, it gets multilibbed there too. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
