Re: arm support of workstation product

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi All,
>
> I noticed that in the hardware supported in the tech specs says 64 bit
> only. I believe that in the f21 time frame we should be able to
> integrate etnaviv [1][2] and be able to offer a viable arm based
> option. note that arm ships in two formats, disk image that's ready to
> run and install tree. there is no support to run anaconda and do a
> liveinstall type install. For some possible systems putting the image
> onto a sdcard and running will be fine. But for some others there may
> be a desire to install onto a hard drive to use.
>
> I personally believe that it is a viable target.

I won't speak for the rest of the WG as a whole, but in the few
conversations I've had with people ARM wasn't something most thought
was a target for Workstation.  It might be feasible for interested
people to produce Workstation ARM images, but I would be surprised if
that were made a requirement at this point.

WG members, thoughts?

josh
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux