On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 22:59 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:55:59AM +0200, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > > Sharing a tool would be weird. > > It will also confuse the users with too many options. > > If the user just downloaded a tool from fedora, it shouldn't promote Arch > > or SUSE. > > Sharing a tool doesn't prevent branding, it just reduces duplication of > effort. Right. Heck, SUSE has a tool: one of the two I'm suggesting on the page ATM. The source is on github: https://github.com/openSUSE/imagewriter all we have to do is send 'em a few lousy PRs to make the branding configurable, add any features we think are missing (image verification, if it doesn't already do it? a little mechanism to find available images for the distro based on a configuration file, then each distro can ship its own config file? the persistence mechanism thing?), and Bob's your uncle, really. Looks like it already runs on Linux as well as Windows, so we have two of our platforms covered right there. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
