On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 10:13 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Luya Tshimbalanga (luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > >As for "on LVM" ... I am not convinced LVM adds any gains on > > >workstation especially if the workstation is a laptop. > > > > Is it possible for the installer to detect if the machine is either a laptop > > or a desktop? That was LWM could be disabled by default. > > /sys/class/dmi/id/chassis_type > > Of course, that value comes from the firmware. You want to trust firmware > vendors? And also, just please, no. Chris' and my read on the discussion over the weekend is that WS is trending towards ext4-on-LVM by default. We can live with that, we're not going to make a stink. Two old-school FSes on LVM as our two defaults isn't the worst outcome in the world. If both workstation and server are OK with having no alternatives on the guided path (alternatives all in custom partitioning), that still makes things rather better for testing (and I think development) than they were before. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
