On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 16:09 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 05:57:56AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> > > - 1024x768 resolution (or 1024x600?) >> > > Too conservative? >> > Is anyone shipping anything below 1366x768 now? Probably worth checking >> > what the requirements for the Windows hardware certification are. >> >> It might be nice to keep 1024x768 projectors in mind. > > VMs are also quite commonly 1024x768. Indeed, someone pointed out to me > recently - don't remember the context - that if you have a 1366x768 > laptop, which is still a perfectly common configuration, the largest > 'nested' display (i.e. VM) you can run without using fullscreen is > 800x600, really. There's still a lot of netbooks and those sort of low end devices with 1024x600 screens too Peter -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
