Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 17:32 +0000, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:17:57 -0800
> Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > There's  probably admins out there are running,
> > > Apples and Oranges on a Pear box.  
> > 
> > It's not really meant to be a security measure. We're not entrenched
> > against our users, here. I don't see any sane way you could make it
> > 'enforcable' without breaking out the DRM or something. :P
> 
> I meant it more as "it won't tell you if product is product"
> If that was the aim?

You can already get into all kinds of trouble using rpm -e --nodeps, and
anyone will tell you that. I don't really see this case as being any
worse.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux