On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:19 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 10:58 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 10:38 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > > > The panel still uses the editor for 802.1x setup and some advanced > > > stuff > > > I think. I'm fine with setting "don't show in GNOME", but that would > > > ideally be either (a) a Fedora specific patch, or (b) if there was > > > some > > > way to restrict it to GNOME 3.6+ but leave it for GNOME 2.x. > > > > I don't want to suggest removing it from the distro: just either from > > the default install, or else using NoShowIn=GNOME. (I don't think that > > should be Fedora-specific. Why would other distros want a redundant > > tool?) > > > > I guess you need to support newer versions of NM in RHEL 6? I think the > > appropriate way to handle that would be to patch out the NoShowIn line > > in RHEL.... Actually no, RHEL6 is completely disconnected from anything we would be discussing here :) I mainly meant that perhaps there are distros that are still using GNOME 2.x that keep other components up-to-date? Maybe not, perhaps they have all started using Cinnamon or MATE; and then we could set NoShowIn=GNOME. > Leaving it out of the stock install seems a much better fit than > NoShowIn to me. If you actually want to use it, you probably want it to > be in the menus. Even in GNOME. Except that the GNOME control center's network panel still uses it, so it does need a hard RPM dependency on nm-connection-editor. We should likely just NoShowIn. Dan -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
