Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 22:37 +0000, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:31:11 -0500
> Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Someone with a custom system who decides to remove a
> > mandatory package would then be removing this release metapackage at
> > the same time
> 
> rpm -e --nodeps ?
> metapackage srpm --remove pkg x from requires.
> It's not watertight.
> 
> There's  probably admins out there are running,
> Apples and Oranges on a Pear box.

It's not really meant to be a security measure. We're not entrenched
against our users, here. I don't see any sane way you could make it
'enforcable' without breaking out the DRM or something. :P
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux