On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/05/2014 09:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher >> <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 03/04/2014 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>>> This with my Personal Opinion hat on, not representing QA: >>>> >>>> I'm not sure all/most people who actually want to use Fedora >>>> KDE are likely to be sold on doing it by downloading what they >>>> will see as 'GNOME', installing that, and then installing KDE >>>> on top of it. I think this will be fine for some folks, but >>>> there'll be a significant constituency which just wants a KDE >>>> image. >>>> >>>> In fact we might be creating a bit of a problem, because I can >>>> see both "want KDE as an alternative desktop on top of the >>>> Workstation product" and "just want Fedora KDE" as two entirely >>>> legitimate and viable constituencies, which sort of means we've >>>> just created a bunch of extra work for ourselves. I'm not sure >>>> I see a clever magical solution to that, though. Engage brain >>>> cells... >>>> >>> >>> I'd suggest that for the Fedora Workstation, we declare that KDE >>> is release-blocking *as an optional component atop the >>> Workstation*. >> >> Please explain this further. Having an optional component be >> release blocking is making my head hurt. > > What I mean is that if I boot the live media, install from it and > select "KDE" during that install process, then having a usable system > after the post-install reboot is blocking. > > Is that more clear? Er, yes and no. I think I see what you're getting at though and that's fine. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
