-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/04/2014 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > This with my Personal Opinion hat on, not representing QA: > > I'm not sure all/most people who actually want to use Fedora KDE > are likely to be sold on doing it by downloading what they will see > as 'GNOME', installing that, and then installing KDE on top of it. > I think this will be fine for some folks, but there'll be a > significant constituency which just wants a KDE image. > > In fact we might be creating a bit of a problem, because I can see > both "want KDE as an alternative desktop on top of the Workstation > product" and "just want Fedora KDE" as two entirely legitimate and > viable constituencies, which sort of means we've just created a > bunch of extra work for ourselves. I'm not sure I see a clever > magical solution to that, though. Engage brain cells... > I'd suggest that for the Fedora Workstation, we declare that KDE is release-blocking *as an optional component atop the Workstation*. For the constituency that wants a pristine KDE environment, they may choose to maintain their own spin, but *that spin* should be removed from the Fedora QA's matrix. (Fedora QA should focus on the Workstation add-on). The KDE SIG likely has its own sufficient resources for testing their pure-KDE spin. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMXKy0ACgkQeiVVYja6o6PHDgCfdFDdJts9R579dFDwLPzTT8Ie fYAAniwK+5x9Gk2AfzZVMZNasXa4A9iy =/GZX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
