On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/04/2014 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> This with my Personal Opinion hat on, not representing QA: >> >> I'm not sure all/most people who actually want to use Fedora KDE >> are likely to be sold on doing it by downloading what they will see >> as 'GNOME', installing that, and then installing KDE on top of it. >> I think this will be fine for some folks, but there'll be a >> significant constituency which just wants a KDE image. >> >> In fact we might be creating a bit of a problem, because I can see >> both "want KDE as an alternative desktop on top of the Workstation >> product" and "just want Fedora KDE" as two entirely legitimate and >> viable constituencies, which sort of means we've just created a >> bunch of extra work for ourselves. I'm not sure I see a clever >> magical solution to that, though. Engage brain cells... >> > > I'd suggest that for the Fedora Workstation, we declare that KDE is > release-blocking *as an optional component atop the Workstation*. Please explain this further. Having an optional component be release blocking is making my head hurt. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
