-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/28/2014 09:31 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram > <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> >>> Others have pointed out that the RHEL7 client uses XFS already. >>> I'm of the opinion that ext4 vs. XFS is pretty comparable for >>> most cases, so I have no strong objections either way. >> >> >> I would say, for consistency, Fedora needs to stick to Ext4 for >> now and switch to Btrfs when it is ready rather than go through a >> switch to XFS for > > Yes, well. As I outlined, some want consistency between products. > Some apparently want consistency with the past. Some want > consistency in whatever way for test reasons. The only thing > consistent about all of this is that everyone has a different > definition of consistent. > >> no real gain. Why is the server team choosing to switch to XFS >> anyway? > > I already explained the response I got in the email you replied > to. Beyond that, I guess we wait for the Server group to provide > rationale. Reposting this to the desktop list: Ric Wheeler (Red Hat's storage and filesystem lead) gave some details on why he recommends XFS for the *Server* use-case: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/196190.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/196193.html I should note that he also recommends EXT4 for Workstation. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMUkeEACgkQeiVVYja6o6NGMwCdGHeb9B9eHtTAHZsAkt53EMVb q4oAoKRJllAxdw5hxjw4p0/vdEJ6mPBT =hpjh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
