On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think most times when this feature has been discussed it has been in the context of btrfs. > I think the current text in the technical specification doesn't got deeper on the subject partly > because we are all a little on the fence for at what time we feel confident enough about btrfs to > dare propose it as the default filesystem for the desktop. I spoke with the btrfs developer at Red Hat > during a conference on the US West Coast towards the end of last year, and he thought that btrfs was > ready for the desktop usecase, although he was not ready to recommend it for server use due to the > (small) risk of data corruption. Sorry but I disagree here ... data corruption is not acceptable on a desktop system either. A server usually have multiple backups (if administered correctly) while a desktop most of the time has none. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
