On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 08:51 +0000, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:37:14 -0500 (EST) > Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I know that for a lot of the teams > > retrace.fedoraproject.org is one of the primary bug prioritization > > tools atm., and the goal would be to have more granularity on that > > site to for instance have the 3 products be something you can filter > > on. > > I've run a "FrankenFedora" since about F3. > (it's not a Gnome 3 thing with me, dialup was expensive) > Will non DE component Bugz still be accepted or ignored. > from those on the tent porch. > Eg. kernel, sytemd, Java, crypt. In general, it's up to the maintainers responsible for a given component how to handle bugs reported against that component. There are certain limited processes like the release validation / release blocker process which sort of act as 'overrides' on this - you kind of are required to care about a bug on a component you own if it's a blocker - but outside of that, it's very much up to the maintainer. I would expect the kernel devs will not be particularly bothered about what desktop you're running in evaluating how much importance to assign to your bug report, for instance. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
